A D.C. Federal appeals court of three judges unanimously today ruled that Donald Trump can face trial on charges that he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election, and that he is not immune to prosecution. Yes, all women: Judges J. Michelle Childs, Florence Pan and Karen Henderson. Want to read what they said?
HERE. This was largely expected, and now will go to the Supreme Court. It will either accept the judgement of this appeals court, or themselves later decide on the matter.
If the Supreme Court delays any ruling until after the 5November2024 presidential election, and Donald Trump wins re-election, he could pardon himself of everything, or arrange for his Department of Justice to ignore prosecution. My sense is that our Supreme Court surely must be concerned about Trump destroying democracy for the nation if he again becomes president, so they will either accept the court ruling or in a timely manner, probably by this summer, itself make a judgement to deny immunity.
The Jack Smith trial with Judge Tanya Chutkan, plus the Georgia RICO case, are the only two truly important ones of real significance, and one of them will no doubt proceed within the next month or two. I suspect that the Georgia version will occur first, and this one will be beamed on national television. I still remember 51 years ago watching the Watergate hearings. The Trump trial will be riveting.
Once the Fani Willis brouhaha is settled, and this could be very soon, then it looks like the Georgia case will proceed first. Trump's chances here look dim, as all of the defendants so far have agreed to plea deals.
Especially fatal for him are these, which occurred this past October:
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) late this week secured plea deals from Sidney Powell and Kenneth Chesebro, the highest-profile defendants to flip so far in the sprawling racketeering case. Both agreed to testify truthfully against their co-defendants, including Trump. However, there is that Fani Willis and Nathan Wade matter that could delay things for a while. Georgia Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has set a February 15 hearing on this matter. All this uncertainty could well move the venue to another Georgia county more MAGA-ish. Such are the trials, tribulations and taradiddles of Donald Trump.
A statement known by its maker to be untrue and made in order to deceive.
To the left is an artwork by Cara De Angelis entitled, Donald Trump with a Crown of Roadkill. You can purchase a print from Saatchi Art for $120.
I'll end with a witty op-ed piece by Maureen Dowd from the
New York Times. If you can't get through there, try the
Irish Times. In short:
- Inside Donald Trump's not-so-Swift brain.
- Yes, Taylor Swift is melanged with Trump throughout.
- For example:
‘Taylor more popular than me? Wrong! My movement is so much bigger and more fanatical than her movement.’
“I like Taylor Swift. I do. She’s made a career of revenge, which gets my Complete and Total Endorsement. She’s beautiful, just my type, unlike that wack job E Jean Carroll and her sick lawyer, Roberta Kaplan.
“I’ll tell you what: The idea that Taylor Swift is more popular than me is a joke. Her fans are 13 years old. They can’t even vote.
“Taylor is being treated like an American icon, but I’m the American icon. I’m trying to save America by destroying democracy, the NFL and Taylor Swift. I know it might seem crazy to attack the things that bind America. But I alone can fix it.
“And Taylor should not have been Time magazine’s Person of the Year. I should have been on the cover. I am the greatest phenomenon in history! And it should still be Man of the Year. What’s with ‘Person’?
Goes on and on. Read the op-ed yourself.
-
A D.C. Federal appeals court of three judges unanimously today ruled that Donald Trump can face trial on charges that he plotted to overturn the results of the 2020 election, and that he is not immune to prosecution. Yes, all women: Judges J. Michelle Childs, Florence Pan and Karen Henderson. Want to read what they said? HERE. This was largely expected, and now will go to the Supreme Court. It will either accept the judgement of this appeals court, or themselves later decide on the matter.
Comments
Post a Comment