From Worldometer (new COVID-19 deaths yesterday):
DAY USA WORLD Brazil India South Africa
2020
June 9 1093 4732 1185 246 82
July 22 1205 7128 1293 1120 572
Aug 12 1504 6556 1242 835 130
Sept 9 1208 6222 1136 1168 82
Oct 21 1225 6849 571 703 85
Nov 25 2304 12025 620 518 118
Dec 30 3880 14748 1224 299 465
2021
Jan 14 4142 15512 1151 189 712
Feb 3 4005 14265 1209 107 398
Mar 2 1989 9490 1726 110 194
April 6 906 11787 4211 631 37
May 4 853 13667 3025 3786 59
June 1 287 10637 2346 3205 95
July 7 251 8440 1595 817 411
Aug 4 656 10120 1118 532 423
Sept 22 2228 9326 839 279 124
Oct 6 2102 8255 543 315 59
Nov 3 1436 7830 186 458 23
Dec 1 1633 8475 266 477 28
2022
Jan 7 2025 6729 148 285 140
Feb 2 2990 12012 946 991 175
Mar 2 1778 7756 335 173 28
Apr 1 439 4056 290 52 12
May 5 225 2404 151 ? 64
June 2 216 1413 130 10 31
July 6 316 1627 335 35 12
Aug 4 311 2138 258 70 ?
Sep 1 272 1732 174 ? ?
Oct 6 281 1305 119 9 ?
Nov 3 167 980 16 ? ?
25 88 985 71 3 ?
Dec 3 149 1029 131 3 ?
8 194 1320 104 6 86
15 147 1295 124 4 ?
22 289 1637 165 9 ?
28 296 1768 337 2 ?
Jan 4 346 1534 207 ? ?
5 220 1611 183 ? ?
12 270 1470 128 ? ?
19 225 1775 480 ? ?
26 351 1361 92 1 7
Feb 1 221 1261 126 ? ?
8 329 999 50 2 ?
Summary:
- The USA had a third of the world covid deaths yesterday. Japan has been leading the world for most of the past couple of months, and was #2 with 200 new deaths. Germany #3 with 127 and Taiwan #4 with 54.
- Japan continued to have the most new cases with 41,584, with the USA and Taiwan #2 and #3, both in the range of 24,000.
- Who knows what is happening in China, which has reported 80,000 covid deaths since early December, which would thus mean around half of all deaths occurred in China. However, most experts say around a million died these past two months, which would mean that China had about a hundred times more deaths than the entire world combined.
- But about the USA, this winter season has only had a mild bump compared to last year and the year before. Hospitalization is a good indicator, for tests are performed and should be reliable.
Turning next to the subject of the day, the death total in the recent Turkey 7.8/7.5 earthquakes has exceeded 20,000. The previous quake of this magnitude occurred in 1999, killing 17,127. A 7.8 earthquake in 1939 saw 32,700 killed. The country is in a seismically active area where the Eurasian, African and Arabian plates are colliding. The orange ones are of magnitude 7 and higher.
- 1905 India (Kangra) 7.8 20,000
- 1908 Italy (Messina) 7.2 82,000
- 1915 Italy (Avezzano) 6.9 32,610
- 1920 China (Hiyuan) 8.6 235,502
- 1923 Japan (Great Kanto) 7.9 142,807
- 1927 China (Gulang) 7.9 80,000
- 1935 Pakistan (Auetta) 8.1 60,000
- 1939 Chile (Chillan) 7.7 28,000
- 1939 Turkey (Erzincan) 7.8 33,000
- 1970 Peru (Ancash) 7.9 70,000
- 1976 Guatemala 7.5 23,000
- 1976 China (Tangshan) 7.6 655,237
- 1988 Armenia 6.7 25,000
- 1990 Iran 7.4 45,000
- 2001 India (Gujarat) 7.6 20,023
- 2003 Iran (Bam) 6.6 31,000
- 2004 Indonesia (Sumatra) 9.1 297,200
- 2005 Pakistan (Kashmir) 7.6 87,351
- 2008 Chiba (Sichuan) 7.6 88,287
- 2010 Haiti 7.0 316,000
- 2023 Turkey (+Syria) 7.8 20,000+
- #1 1556 Sanxi, China 8.0 830,000
- #2 2010 Port-au-Prince, Haiti 7.0 316,000
- #3 115 Antakya, Turkey 7.5 260,000
- #4 525 Antakya, Turkey ? 250,000
- #5 1976 Tangshan, China 7.8 242,769
- #6 1139 Gyzndzha, Azerbaijan ? 230,000
- #7 2004 Sumatra, Indonesia 9.1 227,899
- #8 856 Damghan, Iran 8.3 200,000
- #9 893 Dvin, Armenia ? 150,000
- #10 1923 Tokyo, Japan ? 142,807
Note the differences from the above list by Wikipedia and the one below by Newsweek. For example, a death difference of 655,327 and 242,769 for Tangsan, China. Both numbers can be found in references, and this earthquake only occurred in 1976. Something about reliable data from China. Also, why don't the deaths increase with higher magnitude?
- Location near populations centers.
- Depth of epicenter.
- Type of infrastructure.
And, no matter what people say and in what they believe, there is yet no sure way to predict earthquakes. That from the USGS. From Wikipedia, some statistical data might provide a clue, as for example clustering of smaller earthquakes. The thinking is that maybe 5% of serious earthquakes have followed this sequence.
Then the question is about any value to earthquake warnings. What would be the economic and societal cost to scaring a population base and be a lot more wrong than right. There is that cost-benefit ratio of earthquake prediction.
- Before an earthquake, there are pressure waves and foreshocks not noticed by humans, but detected by a variety of animals. Studies have covered 130 species over thousands of years, mostly in China and Japan. The general conclusion is that these behaviors were not necessarily predictive.
- These waves can be measured by seismometers and other instruments. Something called seismic waves have been confirmed to predict certain earthquakes. It's possible that this method can be developed to work.
- Radon gas released by seismic stress can be measured and used as a prediction tool. However, this phenomenon does not always occur.
- There are electromagnetic anomalies like ultra low frequency magnetic changes, but the field has generally discredited this technique.
- Maybe the most touted (and criticized) claim is the VAN method from the University of Athens. The researchers measured geoelectric voltages, providing from 6 to 115 hours of warning time. Most reviewers found the method to be flawed. A 2020 report indicated that the VAN method suffered from an abundance of false positives and was therefore not usable as a prediction protocol.
- Perhaps the most celebrated prediction occurred in Corralitos, California a month prior to the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake which occurred around 5 miles away. I wrote about my experience with this event several times. Just 3 hours before the quake, a seismo-electromagnetic device soared to about 30 times greater than normal. Certainly, there must have been a reason, but subsequent monitoring throughout California did not repeat anything like this, so the Corralitos anomaly was cast aside as a sensor-system malfunction, or unrelated magnetic disturbance.
- Satellites measurements, ionospheric disturbances and a range of space related options have been looked at, but nothing dependable has developed.
- There are examples of predictive successes for several major earthquakes, but nothing has subsequently been universally acclaimed.
I'll end with some photos from Gretchan Gould about Marjorie Taylor Green regarding the Chinese balloon and the heckling of Biden at his State of the Union presentation.
-
Comments
Post a Comment