The USA has worked well since 1776 because the framers of the Constitution were wise enough to establish a government with a separation of powers: legislative branch makes laws, judicial branch interprets laws and executive branch enforces laws. But the Constitution can be upheld only if these three are independent from each other. For the first time ever in our history, we have a president who does all three whenever he wants, has one branch (the U.S. Congress) afraid to defy him, and the third (Supreme Court) which has already ruled that a sitting president can do anything and be free from prosecution. Democrats and the public are useless in any defense, so President Donald Trump now rules like a dictator.
- We have tended to help needy countries with foreign aid. Of course, doing this also helped our companies gain inroads into those sites, plus, we tended to gain their votes in the United Nations.
- However, Trump thinks the UN and their programs mostly hurts the U.S. He now couldn't care less about what that international institution does. Providing tax dollars to many of those countries does not seem as necessary anymore.
- Yesterday I reported on the U.S.'s previous expansionist Manifest Destiny period. He thinks the U.S. is having our pockets picked by certain countries because of our soft policies, and wants to rectify that attitude by taking control over the Panama Canal (which we built), renaming the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America, ceding Greenland for their resources (I don't see much justification for this heist) and taking control over the Gaza Strip (yes, outrageous, but as nothing has worked in the past, and nothing particularly promising is currently being discussed for the future, perhaps Trump's burgle might be worth some serious discussion).
- The USA has tended to serve as the global leader to combat widespread environmental concerns, now particularly remediation of global warming. Yikes, last month was the warmest January in recorded history! But this is no longer a national priority. While not now considered to be a hoax, Trump is unhappy about the U.S. contributing more to reducing carbon dioxide than countries like China and India. This sort of makes some sense, for he is tired of only us fools making such sacrifices. But to also promote more fossil fuels and abandon greener initiatives? You win some and you lose some, but his defiance of science is dangerous to the future of humanity.
- Same for NATO and the Ukraine-Russia war.
- There are 32 NATO nations.
- Only 11 of them contribute spending 2% of their GDP on defense.
- The U.S. accounted for 68% of all previous NATO expenditures, or $860 billion, a rate of 3.5% our GDP. This amount is 10 times more than second-place Germany. Poland allocates 3.9%, but they are right next to Ukraine, while the USA is a continent and ocean away.
- He does not want to abandon NATO. He just desires them to pay their fair share, and more, for they are closer to Russia.
- TIME magazine wrote, Can He Do That? Well, he did, and we are now in a Constitutional Crisis.
- And, oh....Congressional Republicans have filed several bills to flatter Trump, including ones that would rename Dulles Airport in his honor and add his likeness to Mount Rushmore.
The rise of the new far right has left the world grappling with a profound misunderstanding. While the spotlight often shines on the actions of charismatic leaders such as Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro, the true peril lies elsewhere. Defeating these people will not stem the tide driving them forward. They are merely the embodiment of profound forces that are rarely understood. Propelled through the vast networks of social media and fueled by far-right influencers, enthralled by images of disaster and fantasies of doom, they have emerged from a reservoir of societal despair, fear, and isolation. Within this seething cauldron, we witness not only the surge of far-right political movements but also the sparks of individual and collective violence against perceived enemies, from ‘lone wolf’ killers to terrifying pogroms. Should a new fascism emerge, it will coalesce from these very elements. This is disaster nationalism.
Comments
Post a Comment