Skip to main content

WILL THE DONALD TRUMP COURT CASE IN DC BE TELEVISED?

 Donald Trump again, but first, a few newsworthy developments:

  • More and more of these will begin to appear, but just revealed was a secret memo from a Trump lawyer providing details of faking key state electoral votes  to overturn his 2020 election loss.

That headline look familiar?  On to The Donald, for these indictments remind me of Watergate half a century ago, which was televised and became a huge hit.  Three out of four homes in the USA watched.  I did.   Nixon became the first president in U.S. history to resign.  I was working that summer at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, with an apartment adjacent to Wente Brothers.  Watergate, wine and fusion.  What a summer.  Will Donald Trump's court case regarding his attempted coup be televised live?

Let me start with two Trump truisms (note  the alliteration and some tongue-in-cheek humor):

  • All the commentary and news releases seem to look at this indictment as some kind of political game, seriously dividing the country. 
    • On the one hand, most Republicans believe that there was electoral fraud and this is just judicial overreach to prevent their leading candidate from running in 2024.
    • On the other, Democrats say Trump did actually conspire to overthrow the 2020 election, threatening the foundation of democracy.

  • In American trials, you are considered to be innocent, until proven guilty.  The problem with Donald Trump is that he is a known lier and cheat, so that the prosecution only needs to prove that he is, indeed, guilty.  So only specific to this crook and egomaniac, the prevailing legal principal that should be followed for him is that he is guilty, until proven innocent.  That is truism #1.  Perfect for Trump.

A judge may authorize broadcasting, televising, recording, or taking photographs in the courtroom and in adjacent areas during investitive, naturalization, or other ceremonial proceedings. A judge may authorize such activities in the courtroom or adjacent areas during other proceedings, or recesses between such other proceedings, only:

1) for the presentation of evidence;
2) for the perpetuation of the record of the proceedings; 
3) for security purposes; 
4) for other purposes of judicial administration;  
5) for the photographing, recording, or broadcasting of appellate arguments; or 
6) in accordance with pilot programs approved by the Judicial Conference.

When broadcasting, televising, recording, or photographing in the courtroom or adjacent areas is permitted, a judge should ensure that it is done in a manner that will:

1) be consistent with the rights of the parties, 
2) not unduly distract participants in the proceeding, and
3) not otherwise interfere with the administration of justice.

  • Thus, for a more fair trial, since Washington, DC has too many Democrats, perhaps the venue should be moved.
  • Not to West Virginia, which is too red.
  • What about to Northern California or Western Washington?  Certainly not Guam.
But if in fact federal courts are essentially prohibited from televising the Trump guilty confirmation proceedings, it's probable that the nation will not be able to personally see this grand spectacle unfold.  The greatest criminal case in the history of Planet Earth, and no television coverage.  What a waste.  This is akin to preventing the broadcasting of the Super Bowl to preserve neutrality.
The Supreme Court in 1985 reviewed  the matter of cameras in state courtrooms...

...broadcasters do not have a first or sixth amendment right to televise criminal trials. The Court has also ruled that States may permit cameras in their courtrooms only if the defendant's rights to due process and a fair trial are protected.

There will at some point be a fourth indictment of Trump by the state of Georgia.  State laws, while about the same as for the Feds, does have a window ajar based on that 1955 Supreme Court statement.  There is, further, a Rule 22 for the use of electronic devices in courtrooms.  There seems to be a growing sense that courts should be more open.  Golf courses now pretty much have given up on policing photo-taking because of smartphones.  However, the judiciary moves lethargically, and it might be too much to ask for Georgia to suddenly allow full national TV coverage of their Trump trial.  But Georgia has some weird laws.

Finally, much of this above brouhaha was covered by David Brooks in his recent op-ed.  I recommend you read his article.  Time magazine also has a good summary worthy of your perusal.

The above info pretty much then indicates that this historic trials of once president Donald Trump will NOT be televised.  That would be a shame.  The lack of cameras will only further exacerbate the production of fake news.

  • Fulton County District Attorney Fani Williams has been investigating for more than two years.
  • There is that incriminating phone call to Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.  You've heard the key part.  Here is the entire hour-long call.
  • If judged guilty, and Trump gets re-elected, he can't pardon himself in Georgia
    .  Nor can't anyone else.  
  • If Georgia has a Republican governor, as it currently has in Brian Kemp, he also can't do any pardoning, for in Georgia, that rests to an independent state board.
  • A trial in Georgia is more likely to be televised.

Georgia, on the other hand, offers strong protections for open courts. Members of the media who submit requests to record proceedings are generally allowed to do so. If a judge intends to deny a request, they must promptly hold a hearing on the matter, according to Georgia’s Uniform Superior Court Rule 22. 

That means that if Trump is tried in Georgia for attempting to overturn the 2020 election there, the American public will likely be able to watch the proceedings, including witnesses delivering testimony against him.

Amen.

But wait....where is Melania?  She hasn't appeared with him at a single campaign rally, nor was she present when he as been indicted.  Some say she remains angry over the Stormy Daniels affair.  Others indicate that she doesn't sympathize with his current plights.

The Orient has two ocean storms of concern.  First, the two-week old now Tropical Storm Khanun will strengthen to almost hurricane strength today and make landfall west of Busan, bringing torrential rain and winds.  The Boy Scouts got out in time.  Khanun to the left and Lan to the right.

The new one, Typhoon Lan, looks fierce and will at any moment become a hurricane, attain Category 2 strength on Friday, and slam into the Tokyo area early on Monday.  If you plan to fly into Narita or Haneda that day, closely watch what is happening.

-

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A NEXT COVID SUBVARIANT?

By now most know that the Omicron BA.5 subvariant has become the dominant infectious agent, now accounting for more than 80% of all COVID-19 cases.  Very few are aware that a new one,   BA.4.6,  is sneaking in and steadily rising, now accounting for 13% of sequenced samples .  However, as BA.4.6 has emerged from BA.4, while there is uncertainty, the scientific sense is that the latest bivalent booster targeting BA.4 and BA.5 should also be effective for this next threat. One concern is that Evusheld--the only monoclonal antibody authorized for COVID prevention in immunocompromised individuals--is not effective against BA.4.6.  Here is a  reference  as to what this means.  A series of two injections is involved.  Evusheld was developed by British-Swedish company AstraZeneca, and is a t ixagevimab  co-packaged with  cilgavimab . More recently, Los Angeles County reported on  subvariant BA.2.75.2 . which Tony Fauci termed suspicious and troublesome.  This strain has also been spreading in

Part 3: OUR NEXT AROUND THE WORLD ODYSSEY

Before I get into my third, and final, part of this cruise series, let me start with some more newsworthy topics.  Thursday was my pandemic day for years.  Thus, every so often I return to bring you up to date on the latest developments.  All these  subvariants  derived from that Omicron variant, and each quickly became dominant, with slightly different symptoms.  One of these will shock you. There has been a significant decline in the lost of taste and smell.  From two-thirds of early patients to now only 10-20% show these symptoms. JN.1, now the dominant subvariant, results in mostly mild symptoms. However, once JN.1 infects some, there seem to be longer-lasting symptoms. Clearly, the latest booster helps prevent contracting Covid. A competing subvariant,  BA.2.86,  also known as Pirola , a month ago made a run, but JN.1 prevailed. No variant in particular, but research has shown that some of you will begin to  lose hair  for several months.  This is caused by stress more than anythi

HONOLULU TO SEATTLE

The story of the day is Hurricane Milton, now a Category 4 at 145 MPH, with a track that has moved further south and the eye projected to make landfall just south of Sarasota.  Good news for Tampa, which is 73 miles north.  Milton will crash into Florida as a Category 4, and is huge, so a lot of problems can still be expected in Tampa Bay with storm surge.  If the eye had crossed into the state just north of Tampa, the damage would have been catastrophic.  Milton is a fast-moving storm, currently at 17 MPH, so as bad as the rainfall will be over Florida, again, a blessing.  The eye will make landfall around 10PM EDT today, and will move into the Atlantic Ocean north of Palm Bay Thursday morning. My first trip to Seattle was in June of 1962 just after I graduated from Stanford University.  Caught a bus. Was called the  Century 21 Exposition .  Also the Seattle World's Fair.  10 million joined me on a six-month run.  My first. These are held every five years, and there have only been