From Worldometer (new COVID-19 deaths yesterday):
DAY USA WORLD Brazil India South Africa
June 9 1093 4732 1185 246 82
July 22 1205 7128 1293 1120 572
Aug 12 1504 6556 1242 835 130
Sept 9 1208 6222 1136 1168 82
Oct 21 1225 6849 571 703 85
Nov 25 2304 12025 620 518 118
Dec 30 3880 14748 1224 299 465
Jan 14 4142 15512 1151 189 712
Feb 3 4005 14265 1209 107 398
Mar 2 1989 9490 1726 110 194
April 6 906 11787 4211 631 37
May 4 853 13667 3025 3786 59
June 1 287 10637 2346 3205 95
July 7 251 8440 1595 817 411
Aug 4 656 10120 1118 532 423
Sept 1 1480 10470 703 505 235
8 1700 9836 250 339 253
14 1934 9001 709 281 300
22 2228 9326 839 279 124
27 689 5376 218 181 164
Summary: Hmmm....something looks too good, so must be somehow questionable. Well, I usually don't show Monday figures, so let's see how these numbers look tomorrow.
Ray Kamada, who blogs from the state of Washington, sent me his analysis of the current debate regarding the morality of the USA moving ahead with booster shots when developing countries are at vaccinations rates below 10%. Two telling points are that this is not a simple matter, for the U.S. is faced with one of the two mRNA-based vaccine--by Pfizer--not being a safe life preserver, but a leaking one, plus these both cannot really be used by many undeveloped countries. Read his thoughts:
Yet, such purely ethical discussions overlook a major technical detail. And that is - the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines require unbroken chains of ultra-cold transport and storage that simply aren't available in ~40% of the globe. And this void exists mostly in the same nations that have low vaccination rates. So, together with their high production costs, the two mRNA-based Covid vaccines, produced entirely in the US, are by nature ill-suited for such nations
Let's begin with one stark fact. Pfizer vaccine-based immunity to Delta-driven infection and hospitalization seems to have faded roughly twice as fast as that based on the Moderna vaccine. Thus, if each nation aims to minimize its own Covid transmission rate, then, besides prophylactic measures, boosting its immunity via the Moderna vaccine at 8 months seems about optimal. But, contrary to the current CDC stance, it really looks like only about 4 months for Pfizer. Note that these tipping points are well-supported by the Israeli and Mayo Clinic data, plus more recent, multi-state reports collated by the CDC. (Read here, here and here.)
Intertwined with the above issues, we also mention that, as of late August 2021, at least 15 million US doses had spoiled and gone to waste, due mostly to lack of interest or even an outright disdain, promoted largely by red state governors who, unsurprisingly, have all been vaccinated. (Wasted doses reports here, here, here, here, here and here.)
While I personally have been concerned about the inability of Moderna to gain even emergency use for their booster, the developing reality that their vaccine is effective for twice as long as Pfizer's is reassuring.
Before I get into my science topic of this week, I mention that last Wednesday I posted Update on Fusion. I just noticed in Quora a similar discussion:
This becomes a chicken and the egg situation - a vicious cycle. We can’t get fusion without funding, support, leadership and help. But - not getting support, means we can’t get fusion funding, which makes fusion harder to achieve, which in-turn kills support, which means we can’t get fusion funding, which… Right now, there are lots of examples of fusion research teams in need of a very small amount of funding for fusion; but they can’t seem to get the attention of investors, private or public. These include:
Well, that was last week. My science topic this week begins on Tuesday with a detailed coverage of what could lead to a permanent extinction event, continuing in part 2 tomorrow focusing on Planet Venus, which could well be the future of Planet Earth if something I call The Venus Syndrome occurs. These thoughts congealed 14 years ago when the closing chapter of my SIMPLE SOLUTIONS for Planet Earth featured this cataclysmic ending for our globe. You can read my book, or go to the Huffington Post for some summaries:
Part of the stimulus for this particular blog is a perspective provided by Rinaldo Brutoco of the World Business Academy on The Methane Accelerator:
- We know about the falling levels of Lake Powell land Lake Mead, but don't know that the situation in the Middle East and Africa is worse.
- He indicates that the climate change models of the UN IPCC are dominated by carbon dioxide. The influence of methane is only now catching their attention.
- This vicious feedback loop he calls the Methane Accelerator:
Get ready to be jolted: that new attention to methane means the public will be hearing that climate change is a) much more severe than previously thought, and b) that it is accelerating at a geometric (as opposed to an arithmetic) rate.
It turns out that massive amounts of methane are being released from ocean marine hydrates, and these are rapidly accelerating, and from the thawing permafrost due to atmospheric and ocean warming. The released methane is the “X Factor” in climate change, independently functioning as a powerful accelerant of greater atmospheric heating, faster ice melt, more severe weather disturbances, ocean acidification, and rising seas.
In its most disturbing finding, the Academy concludes that, when the cumulative effects from the Methane Accelerator are fully considered, mankind is likely to have already passed the “tipping point” where merely reducing CO2 emissions, even to zero, will not be sufficient to curtail the catastrophic effects of climate change.
- Accelerating methane releases are accelerating the effects of climate change so we can better predict how bad it will become, and how fast. That’s helpful. And, be aware that a spontaneous “trigger” of a massive methane release could occur once again at any time resulting in another global mass extinction event. We simply must “wake up’ to this threat immediately so we can begin to address a responsible geoengineering solution that would prevent such a catastrophe.
That's exactly what I said 14 years ago, when after release of my book I gave a talk at the University of Hawaii, and had a lot of "experts" in the audience shaking their head at my naivete. The dean of a school made some statement about how can this could possibly be so when there was so little methane in the atmosphere. In those days, no noteworthy researcher in this field published on the potential danger of methane.
On the surface, they make sense, for our atmosphere is 0.0404% carbon dioxide to 0.00018% methane. 224 times more carbon dioxide than methane.
But, ah, depending the circumstance, molecule versus molecule, methane can be from 15 to 125 times more potent in inducing the Greenhouse Effect than carbon dioxide. More important, in the tundra and coastline are vast amounts of methane compounds that if jostled from a current metastability and suddenly released into the atmosphere can cause something I termed The Venus Syndrome. The particular danger is when methane suddenly explodes to the surface, where the puissance factor is even higher than 125. The Venus Syndrome occurs when we reach this tipping point.
This phenomenon has been named by some as one reason why life on our globe has gone through five extinction periods. The worst one was 250 million years ago when 96% of marine species and 70% on land disappeared. The usual suspects are asteroids, super volcano eruptions and carbon dioxide. However, included with these more conventional surmisals are methane hydrates as maybe a possible super villain. Something called the clathrate gun hypothesis is worthy of your knowledge.
Methane hydrate is also called methane clathrate, and popularly known as fire ice because you can burn it. Frighteningly, there is twice as much energy in marine methane hydrates as all the known fossil fuel deposits on land. Finally, the nailing factor is that much of this ocean fire ice is located right on top of and otherwise near the Ring of Fire in the Pacific
What are the odds of the Ring of Fire, the entire ring, suddenly erupting to release these methane hydrate deposits? Miniscule, of course, but not impossible. As a worse case scenario, can The Venus Syndrome result in Planet Earth becoming the exact twin of Planet Venus?
I've had difficulty continuing my book on The Venus Syndrome because for the longest time I just could not come up with any kind of non-preposterous solution to overcome this extinction phenomenon. Then, as I was filming my TEDx talk, it occurred to me that among the cornucopia of benefits provided by the Blue Revolution, just maybe another one could be a solution to this quandary. What this might be will not be shared until I complete that book.
-
Typhoon Mindulle overnight strengthened to 115 MPH, and the Japan Times today showed this graphic:
Mindulle is the 16th named ocean storm in the West Pacific, and the above track sequence surely looks threatening. However I checked various other models, and most of them shows this typhoon making almost a right turn and passing sufficiently far away along the east coast of Japan. But as I always say, you're never sure until you are.
I might mention that Hurricane Sam is still plodding along in the Atlantic, having reached 150 MPH on Sunday, and today still a Category 4. About all the trouble he will cause will be to ships and waves along the East Coast.
-
Comments
Post a Comment