
I watched two films last night, one on Netflix and another on Amazon Prime, that grabbed my attention regarding my life, but in totally different ways. One was loved by Rotten Tomatoes reviewers, gaining a 94 rating, with audiences giving only 79. The other was the opposite, with RT reviewers at 82 and audiences 95. For me, both were excellent films. So what I will do on Sundays devoted to spiritualism and my personal life, is to have a two-part series, featuring this contradistinction...... Next week will be bit edgy, but today I start with my wonderful life. Secure, comfortable and happy.
However, in the process of developing this two-part series, I made several mistakes.- The Prime movie was Complete Unknown, released in 2016, starring Rachel Weisz, and also included some noted actors like Danny Glover and Kathy Bates.
- On re-checking with Rotten Tomatoes, I saw scores only of 52/27. I was confused because I remember going to Rotten Tomatoes before seeing that movie, and know there were very high numbers.
- So something was awry. What happened was that when I first went to RT for Complete Unknown, I did not realize that I was sent to A Complete Unknown, a film I had already seen only a few months ago, but pretty much forgot about. Good flick actually, for this one was on the life of Bob Dylan, and did get those high 82/95 RT scores.
- I certainly would not have even bothered to watch Complete Unknown if I knew it was rated 52/27.
- On the other hand, maybe the problem is me, for just a few days ago I went through this Rotten Tomatoes process for a film called Close. Saw that it was made in 2022 and had high scores of 91/88. These figures led to my watching it. To make a longer story short, turns out that there is another film with the same title, Close, made in 2019. Rotten Tomatoes scores of 35/35. This is the one I actually saw. Frankly, and this says something about how I can be influenced, for I thought this junk Close was not that bad. Should I now go to see that higher rated Close? Can't, because it is not on Prime nor Netflix.
- In 1958 I selected Stanford over Cal Tech. Certainly, my professional life would have been hugely different if I went to the latter.
- Then in 1962, most of my close friends at Stanford chose to join the first full year of the Peace Corps. I compromised here in many ways. First, I was interested in studying art at Sophia University in Tokyo. Skipped that to instead return to Hawaii to help save the sugar industry. Failed at that because sugar is now gone.
- About graduate school, had a choice of New York University Law School or Louisiana State University Chemical Engineering. The sugar industry paid my salary to go into the LSU sugar program in their chemical engineering department. Lost my support from the company, but chose to stay on for a PhD in biochemical engineering. Went on to join the University of Hawaii College of Engineering in 1972.
- In the mid-70's seriously thought about staying at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to participate in their laser fusion program, but returned to the University of Hawaii because I thought the laser to accomplish this task was many too years into the future. This is now 50 years later and that laser has yet to be invented.
- Went to work for Senator Spark Matsunaga in DC in 1979, after which he offered me a really good salary to stay with him. Instead, my wife Pearl worked for him in his Honolulu office, allowing me to return to the University of Hawaii.
- At the age of 59 decided to take early retirement from the University of Hawaii, even though I had the best job in the world. This was the one and only time I just did what I wanted to do.
- So while I still maintain an office at the UH, I've now been retired for 26 years, the best continuous 26 of my entire life.
- Now 84, do I finally do something even more adventurous? I don't think so.
Comments
Post a Comment